Solar Economics: Lease Vs. Own

Via The Institute for Local Self Reliance, an interesting analysis of the economics behind solar power:

It’s a case study of solar in Ithaca, NY, but it provides a good framework for comparing leasing to ownership in any place in the U.S.

Comparing solar ownership to a solar lease can be tricky.  The following analysis examines the value of owning a 5 kW solar PV system which can be used for comparison to a quote from a solar leasing company.  Overall, long-term solar ownership can be very profitable.

The comparison can be done in two ways. The first examines the cash flow of two options for paying for your own solar array: with all cash upfront or with a bank loan at 5% interest.  If you pay cash, you’ll be making money from day one, including all forecast maintenance costs.  If paying off debt, it will cost extra until the loan can be paid off in approximately 5 years.

We’re not taking into account what are called the “opportunity costs” of the investment, that is, the return it could earn if put into other types of investments.  Consumers rarely do this type of analysis, although businesses often do.  We are also not including any tax deduction for the interest paid if the solar array were financed with a home equity loan.

The second common way to evaluate an investment is to examine its return.  This can be used to compare it to other investments, like treasury securities, mutual funds, or stocks.   As we can see, the cash investment has a good return over 15 years, and both solar financing options provide a good return over 25 years.

Financial Measures of Project Value

Finance Type Years to Payback 15-year ROI 25-year ROI Profit/Loss at 15 years Profit/Loss at 25 years
Cash 10 9% 12.50% $5,000 $16,050
Debt (80% of total cost) 18 n/a 7.50% ($2,400) $8,650

Neither of these analyses take into account the increased appreciation of the home because of having a solar array.  A number of studies indicate that when selling the home one would get back a significant percentage of the installation value.

Comparison to Solar Leasing

Solar leasing offers several benefits over ownership, but also some potential liabilities.  Benefits include no maintenance (yearly cleaning, potential inverter replacement, etc) and little to no upfront investment.  But a solar lease should be examined closely and its assumptions compared to those in this analysis:

  • Projected Savings: How do projected savings compare to ownership?
  • Inflation Assumptions: A lease typically has two inflation rates, one for the lease payment (fixed) and one for the grid electricity price (a guess).  If the latter ends up being lower than forecast (I’ve seen them as high as 5%!), it can significantly reduce projected savings.
  • Lease End: What happens when the lease expires?  Can the system be purchased?  How does the purchase price compare to the projected savings to that point?  This is very important because of the potential value of the solar array to the resale price of the home.  Also one can inquire whether an inverter replacement already been done when the system is available for purchase.
  • Company History: Will the company be around in 10-15 years to fulfill their lease requirements?

In summary, comparing ownership to leasing isn’t easy, but this guide can help by comparing the economics and challenging the assumptions of the lease agreement.

Assumptions for the Economics of Solar Ownership

Upfront Costs

Installed cost: $25,000
Combined incentives: $20,000
Total cost: $5,000

Ongoing Balance Sheet

Maintenance: $250 per year (including inverter replacement every 10-15 years)
Electricity savings: $838 in first year
Finance costs (if applicable): $2,600 per year for 10 years

Inflation, Financing, and Incentives

Estimated solar output: 5,776 kilowatt-hour per year for a 5 kW (DC) system
Estimated installed cost: $25,000 ($5 per Watt)
Federal incentive: 30% tax credit ($7,500)
State incentives: 25% tax credit on installed cost, up to $5,000; NYSERDA rebate of $1.50 per Watt ($7,500)
Electricity price inflation: 3% per year, starting at 14.5¢ per kilowatt-hour
Panel output decrease: 0.5% per year
Borrowing costs: 5% interest on 10-year, $20,000 loan.  Largely paid back in year 2 with incentives.

Sensitivity Analysis

What happens if our assumptions are wrong?  The following table compares the 15-year profitability of a PV system paid for with cash under different scenarios.



This entry was posted on Friday, August 3rd, 2012 at 2:47 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


About This Blog And Its Author
As potential uses for building and parking lot roofspace continue to grow, unique opportunities to understand and profit from this trend will emerge. Roof Options is committed to tracking the evolving uses of roof estate – spanning solar power, rainwater harvesting, wind power, gardens & farms, “cooling” sites, advertising, apiculture, and telecom transmission platforms – to help unlock the nascent, complex, and expanding roofspace asset class.

Educated at Yale University (Bachelor of Arts - History) and Harvard (Master in Public Policy - International Development), Monty Simus has held a lifelong interest in environmental and conservation issues, primarily as they relate to freshwater scarcity, renewable energy, and national park policy. Working from a water-scarce base in Las Vegas with his wife and son, he is the founder of Water Politics, an organization dedicated to the identification and analysis of geopolitical water issues arising from the world’s growing and vast water deficits, and is also a co-founder of SmartMarkets, an eco-preneurial venture that applies web 2.0 technology and online social networking innovations to motivate energy & water conservation. He previously worked for an independent power producer in Central Asia; co-authored an article appearing in the Summer 2010 issue of the Tulane Environmental Law Journal, titled: “The Water Ethic: The Inexorable Birth Of A Certain Alienable Right”; and authored an article appearing in the inaugural issue of Johns Hopkins University's Global Water Magazine in July 2010 titled: “H2Own: The Water Ethic and an Equitable Market for the Exchange of Individual Water Efficiency Credits.”