Rainwater Harvesting: Saving For A Rainy Day

Via Spouting Off, an interesting article on the Los Angeles County’s recently released rainwater harvesting guidelines:

L.A. County’s Department of Public Health has just released rainwater harvesting guidelines that  help transform the region’s management of stormwater runoff.  The guidelines apply to rainwater harvesting projects, including rain barrels and cisterns, and they significantly shift the approach from treating rainwater as a pollution source and flood control problem to managing it as a critical resource.

The guidelines were released at the site of a massive Proposition O project at Penmar Park in Venice.  A giant pit and a huge dirt mound served as the backdrop Tuesday for the modest press event (the Conrad Murray verdict occurred an hour earlier).  The Penmar Park project will capture runoff from the watershed from south-east Sunset Park in Santa Monica and the Santa Monica Airport and the Rose Avenue neighborhood near Walgrove Avenue.  The cistern will store approximately 1 million gallons of runoff, which will then be disinfected and used for irrigation at the Penmar golf course and park.

The rainwater harvesting guidelines were negotiated over a two-year period with the City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, and the environmental community, led by Heal the Bay and Treepeople.  They provide clarity and certainty to project developers on how to move forward with projects that capture and reuse rainwater.  L.A. County Public Health, especially Angelo Bellomo and Kenneth Murray, earn major props for moving the guidelines forward.

The structure of the guidelines is relatively simple.  There are four tiers of projects:

Tier 1 is for on-site collection of rainwater with rain barrels, and the requirements are pretty limited.  Most important, separate permitting isn’t required for them, so rain barrel use should proliferate now.

Tier 2 is for the on-site collection of rainwater in cisterns for on-site uses.  Again, the requirements are relatively limited, especially for small cisterns on residential properties.  For tier 2 and all tiers, monitoring and treatment requirements are trivial for subsurface or drip irrigation. If the runoff is used for spray irrigation or an outdoor water feature, then the runoff from the cistern needs to be disinfected to meet fecal indicator bacteria standards that are equivalent to the single sample maximum for swimming on ocean waters. Larger systems need County Public Health review in order to ensure there are no sewer cross-connections.

Tier 3 applies to cisterns that receive runoff from on-site or off-site, and for use of the runoff on-site or off-site.  However, the runoff cannot come from a drainage that includes industrial land uses.  Tier 3 is similar to Tier 2, but spray irrigation cannot occur during daylight hours.  Runoff used for spray irrigation, water features, street sweeping, and dust control must be disinfected to meet bacteria standards. These projects would get a more thorough review from the public health department.

Tier 4 is identical to Tier 3, except that the runoff drainage area can include industrial land uses.  The big difference is that the runoff from Tier 4 projects must be analyzed for toxic metals, volatile organic compounds (solvents) and semi-volatile organic compounds (petroleum) to ensure that the runoff poses no health risk to anyone that comes in contact with it.

The guidelines are common sense and should greatly help developers in their decisions to install low-impact development BMPs that capture and use runoff.  Look for a proliferation of rainwater harvesting projects in the region, which should really reduce runoff pollution and reliance on imported water supplies.

The rainwater harvesting guidelines are the first of their kind in all of California.  The next priority is to get all of California’s environmental health agencies to adopt similar guidelines in the near future.  Also, the State Water Board should adopt the guidelines as a policy for the state.  These moves would go a long way towards incentivizing rainwater harvesting projects, and moving California towards a water management strategy that includes the local, reliable source of water that comes from the sky.



This entry was posted on Thursday, November 10th, 2011 at 7:03 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


About This Blog And Its Author
As potential uses for building and parking lot roofspace continue to grow, unique opportunities to understand and profit from this trend will emerge. Roof Options is committed to tracking the evolving uses of roof estate – spanning solar power, rainwater harvesting, wind power, gardens & farms, “cooling” sites, advertising, apiculture, and telecom transmission platforms – to help unlock the nascent, complex, and expanding roofspace asset class.

Educated at Yale University (Bachelor of Arts - History) and Harvard (Master in Public Policy - International Development), Monty Simus has held a lifelong interest in environmental and conservation issues, primarily as they relate to freshwater scarcity, renewable energy, and national park policy. Working from a water-scarce base in Las Vegas with his wife and son, he is the founder of Water Politics, an organization dedicated to the identification and analysis of geopolitical water issues arising from the world’s growing and vast water deficits, and is also a co-founder of SmartMarkets, an eco-preneurial venture that applies web 2.0 technology and online social networking innovations to motivate energy & water conservation. He previously worked for an independent power producer in Central Asia; co-authored an article appearing in the Summer 2010 issue of the Tulane Environmental Law Journal, titled: “The Water Ethic: The Inexorable Birth Of A Certain Alienable Right”; and authored an article appearing in the inaugural issue of Johns Hopkins University's Global Water Magazine in July 2010 titled: “H2Own: The Water Ethic and an Equitable Market for the Exchange of Individual Water Efficiency Credits.”