California Homeowners Recoup Their Investment in PV

A study by Ben Hoen, Ryan Wiser and Peter Cappers of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Mark Thayer at San Diego State University finds that, on average, the sales price of homes with PV systems is boosted enough to cover the homeowner’s own investment in the solar power system.

As The Energy Collective comments:

“…One might, as the Berkeley Labs’ press release does, style this as good news for PV systems (“homes with solar photovoltaic systems sell for a premium over homes without solar systems”). I guess as home improvement projects go, an investment in which homeowners on average get all their money back is pretty good — much better than the return on building a swimming pool, not as good as a minor kitchen makeover.

On the other hand, as another Berkeley Lab reports, average total installed costs of home PV systems have ranged between $7 and $10 per DC watt of capacity installed over the 2001-2009 period included in the first study’s dataset and yet the home price premium is estimated to be about $5.5 per DC watt of capacity. One might expect that taxpayer/ratepayer subsidies for home improvements would on net add to the subsidized homeowner’s value, but apparently that is not the case.”

Sungevity’s corporate blog offers a more enthusiastic commentary:

“…If you’re a solar homeowner, you already know that going solar is a good financial move because of the electricity bill savings. But did you know that customer-owned solar homes have substantially higher resale value?

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) has just completed a thorough review of the effect of solar PV systems on home prices in California, and their conclusion is staggering:  The average non-PV home sold for $480,862 (in 2009 dollars).  The average PV home sold for $537,442.  That means that, if you own your PV system, you can expect your solar home to sell for 9% more than a comparable non-solar home in your neighborhood.

Or, to look at it another way, LBNL says that the premium on the typical 3-kW PV system is $17,000 — if you sell your home with a paid off PV system, you’ll get $17,000 more thanks to your solar array.  (The math is tricky – read the report if you want to geek out on the calculations).

If you’re leasing a system, keep the number 17k in mind when you’re considering whether to pay off the balance of your lease and own your system outright. Paying off your system will more than pay for itself in increased home value.

Factor in the electricity bill savings, and you have yourself a financial win-win. Factor in Mother Earth, and we’ll call it a win-win-win.”



This entry was posted on Saturday, May 7th, 2011 at 7:04 am and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


About This Blog And Its Author
As potential uses for building and parking lot roofspace continue to grow, unique opportunities to understand and profit from this trend will emerge. Roof Options is committed to tracking the evolving uses of roof estate – spanning solar power, rainwater harvesting, wind power, gardens & farms, “cooling” sites, advertising, apiculture, and telecom transmission platforms – to help unlock the nascent, complex, and expanding roofspace asset class.

Educated at Yale University (Bachelor of Arts - History) and Harvard (Master in Public Policy - International Development), Monty Simus has held a lifelong interest in environmental and conservation issues, primarily as they relate to freshwater scarcity, renewable energy, and national park policy. Working from a water-scarce base in Las Vegas with his wife and son, he is the founder of Water Politics, an organization dedicated to the identification and analysis of geopolitical water issues arising from the world’s growing and vast water deficits, and is also a co-founder of SmartMarkets, an eco-preneurial venture that applies web 2.0 technology and online social networking innovations to motivate energy & water conservation. He previously worked for an independent power producer in Central Asia; co-authored an article appearing in the Summer 2010 issue of the Tulane Environmental Law Journal, titled: “The Water Ethic: The Inexorable Birth Of A Certain Alienable Right”; and authored an article appearing in the inaugural issue of Johns Hopkins University's Global Water Magazine in July 2010 titled: “H2Own: The Water Ethic and an Equitable Market for the Exchange of Individual Water Efficiency Credits.”